![]() |
ACCURATE DEMOCRACYVoting Rules for Elections and Meetings |
![]() |
| Voting-Rule Overview | shows the merits of 6 great rules. | |
| Voting-Rule Workshop | shows the simple steps in each tally. |
|
Democratic Solutions
These pages explain improvements for democracy in any size from schoolroom to nation, and at all steps from nominating candidates to allocating budgets. The concepts build from one voting task to the next: |
| Single-Winner Election | Condorcet rules pick a widely-popular and central chairperson. | |
| Multi-Winner Election | Proportional Representation builds a diverse and balanced council. | |
| Mixed-Member Council | The chair and reps make a centrally-balanced council. New | |
| Policy Decision | Condorcet with rules of order leads to central policies. New | |
| Project Selection | Fair-share spending selects and funds diverse projects. New | |
| Budget Setting | Budget Refill Voting quickly sets all agency budgets. New | |
| What's Wrong? Our defective voting rules come from the failure to realize there are different types of election. And these require different methods of voting. “We try to carry over to more complicated situations a method which is only suitable in deciding the simplest sort of issue, that is, whether a question with only two possible answers shall be answered yes or no.” “For such an issue a simple majority election is, of course, sufficient.” |
As soon as three candidates run for one office, the race becomes more complicated.Then a simple yes-no vote is no longer suitable. Sometimes what we want is not a single officer, but a council that represents all the voters. Now we do not need a system of dividing voters into winners and losers. Instead we need a way of condensing them, in the right proportions, into their chosen leaders. |
DEMOCRACY EVOLVESEras, Election Rules and Typical Councils |
|
A “centrist policy” enacts a narrow point of view; as it excludes other opinions and needs. A “one-sided policy” also ignores rival ideas. A “compromise policy” tries to negotiate rival plans. But contrary plans forced together often work poorly; and so does the average of rival plans. In contrast, a “balanced policy” unites compatible ideas from all sides.
This process needs advocates for diverse proposals.
|
||
| A broad balanced majority works to enact broad balanced policies — which give the greatest chance for happiness to the greatest number of people. Excellent policies are a goal of accurate democracy. Their success is measured in a typical voter's education and income, freedom and safety, health and leisure. An ensemble is inclusive; yet it is strongly centered and decisive. Voting rules for other tasks can follow this pattern. These will make the organization more popular, stable and quick. They are likely to avoid the one-sided results and tragedies at the top of this and other pages. | |
|
|
|
|
Students may be most interested in
1) the primer on voting rules, 2) the workshop on movable votes, 3) the simulation tool PoliticalSim™ |
|
A Map to Accurate Democracy
Six practical uses for voting shape this ebook.
| |||||
| Elections | Legislation | ||||
| Ballot
Pictorial Tally IRV Others Tactics Districts | Merits
Women STV Visual STV Pictorial 2 2D charts Ballots | Merits
Merits 2 CW+STV Others Notes Seats Shares | Motions
Ballots Trades Tactics Cycles Others Amend | Uses
Needs Notes Sim Ballots Tallies LAR | Follies
Ballots Others Notes Medians HZ Points Coalitions |
| Condorcet's rule fills chapter 1 on electing a chairperson. Chapter 4 on setting a policy looks at it more deeply. Chapters 3 and 5 also use it.
Transferable votes are introduced by IRV and STV in chapters 1 and 2. Chapters 5 and 6 show how they can fund projects and departments. | |||||
|
Translations: Babel Fish,
Google,
|
Yes
Irish playwright G. B. Shaw satirized chauvinist pride
and ignorance in some leaders of the British Empire.
Back to humor question 1
No
|
Searching for more? This discipline is fractured by many synonyms. Even its title varies: some call it public choice; others prefer social choice. College courses that look at voting theory include economics and comparative politics or comparative government. The table below has many terms that can help you find similar web sites. You will find most of these terms include topics other than formulas for calculating winners from ballots. Searching for "voting systems" will bring you most often to sites that sell voting equipment. So will "election systems" and "ballot systems". "Election rules" bring up ballot access, campaign funding, media regulation and other laws while missing legislative voting. "Voting procedures" or "methods" suggest instructions for casting ballots. "Tally rules" is good but may neglect ballots or include tallies of things other than votes. "Voting rules" seems the least ambiguous term for ways of counting votes.
The election chapters' terms for electing, nominating or selecting a:
The legislation chapters' terms to enact, set, pass, fund or budget:
Please try PoliticalSim tm (political sim), a free open-source political simulation game for Windows, and SimElection tm, electoral simulation software for Macintosh, for interactive simulations of approval voting, Borda rule, Condorcet rules (minmax or Copeland), instant runoff voting (IRV, alternative vote, Hare), majority rule, plurality rule (aka first past the post, FPTP), proportional representation (list PR, full representation, proportional voting), single transferable vote (STV, choice voting), cumulative vote, limited vote, bloc vote and other voting rules.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||